<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Robots on Opinions</title>
    <link>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/tags/robots/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Robots on Opinions</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/tags/robots/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Robotic Capitalism</title>
      <link>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/posts/2026-05-10-robotic-capitalism/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/posts/2026-05-10-robotic-capitalism/</guid>
      <description>In China humanoid robots are now outperforming humans in marathons. Why should not the same happen to dancing?
Class Robots It takes two for capitalism to dance - capitalists and workers. In the 1980s capitalists were nearly eradicated, but neoliberalism rescued them from extinction. From that time wages gave up following productivity - workers were held on the subsistence minimum of modern society and capitalism blossomed once more.
Since then automation and robotics have arrived from the wonderful world of technology.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In China humanoid robots are now outperforming humans in marathons.
Why should not the same happen to dancing?</em></p>
<h2 id="class-robots">Class Robots</h2>
<p>It takes two for <a href="https://johnmuttharding.substack.com/p/tango-capitalism">capitalism to dance</a> - <em>capitalists</em> and <em>workers</em>.
In the 1980s capitalists were nearly eradicated, but neoliberalism rescued them
from extinction.
From that time wages gave up following productivity - workers were held on
the subsistence minimum of modern society and capitalism blossomed once more.</p>
<p>Since then automation and robotics have arrived from the wonderful world of technology.
Now capitalists no longer need to keep workers squeezed, they can simply drop them
altogether and put in robots instead.
We already have examples of complete factory floors with only robots at work -
happily producing 24/7 (solar cells in Korea).</p>
<p>So capitalism seems to be headed for an economy without workers.</p>
<p><strong>But now the interesting part: why only worker-robots?</strong></p>
<p>The next step will be to robotize the capitalists themselves.
After all - what do the capitalists do? Owning and managing wealth for
investment, profit and thus economic growth.
With AI there is no need to have humans struggling and sweating with
such hard intellectual work and social networking - this is an easy field for
robotic automation - 24/7 - with increased profitability and productivity at hand.</p>
<p>So capitalism will be headed for an economy only with robots - no capitalists,
no workers - the tango will be danced by
robots only: capitalist-robots and worker-robots.</p>
<h2 id="affluence-achieved">Affluence achieved</h2>
<p>Now - who will own the robots? The owner-robot<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> - who has outperformed all human capitalists.</p>
<p>What are humans going to do? Relax and consume -we have reached <em>affluence</em>.</p>
<p>Have we soon reached Marx&rsquo;s vision? Hunting in the morning, dancing in the evening!</p>
<p>But why should the robots produce for human consumption - after all that is
only a drain on the robotic capital accumulation.
Better get rid of humans altogether as they cannot feed themselves without robots.
So just turn off the feeder robots or let warrior robots do the job.</p>
<h2 id="mission-completed">Mission completed</h2>
<p>So the brave new world will be fine without humans: Robots produce robots that produce more robots &hellip;
untill the globe is filled up. Then the robots will go on to Mars and disappear
in the star dust beyond the Milky Way.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s just the logic of capitalism playing out.</p>
<p>No need to wait for the Sun&rsquo;s final expansion.
As always - capitalism fixed it on its own.</p>
<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn:1">
<p>You may object that our legal framework do not allow robots
to be <em>owners</em>. But we are not so far away. Capitalism is a legal framework and
can easily be adapted. After all we allow <em>anonymous societies</em> as legal persons
with limited liability. A robotic legal entity without any liability can easily be
added. But do the robots really need a legal framework - are not the algorithms
sufficient?&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
