<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ai on Opinions</title>
    <link>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/tags/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ai on Opinions</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Life of Economics after AI</title>
      <link>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/posts/2026-04-18-the-life-of-economics-after-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://dyrehaugen.github.io/rde/posts/2026-04-18-the-life-of-economics-after-ai/</guid>
      <description>Commodifying human interaction AI replaces scarcity with abundance. Economics is the discipline for management of scarcity. Will AI make economics irrelevant?
No, says Alex Imas &amp;ldquo;we will still have scarcity, but the kind of scarcity that matters will change.&amp;rdquo;
It may be reasonable for an economist to be unable to accept the need for his daily business disappear, so he goes on with a lengthy essay and CES-modelling to find the new kind of scarcity that AI presumably will conway.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="commodifying-human-interaction">Commodifying human interaction</h2>
<p>AI replaces scarcity with abundance.
Economics is the discipline for management of scarcity.
Will AI make economics irrelevant?</p>
<p>No, says <a href="https://aleximas.substack.com/p/what-will-be-scarce">Alex Imas</a>
&ldquo;we will still have scarcity, but the <em>kind</em> of scarcity that matters will change.&rdquo;</p>
<p>It may be reasonable for an economist to be unable to accept the need for his
daily business disappear, so he goes on with a lengthy essay and CES-modelling
to find the new kind of scarcity that AI presumably will conway.</p>
<p>And he finds it.
As AI turns everything into robotics, humans will start missing the real
human interaction they get for free in our pre-robotic societies.
The AI revolution thus as a side-effect produces the continued need for
the discipline of economics - now turning it&rsquo;s focus on the management
of the new scarce commodity: &ldquo;relational experiences&rdquo; that can
substitute for the lack of human interaction produced by the same
AI-revolution.</p>
<p>It is not so simple that we humans can just take our new abundance and
enjoy the good life of free time in happy togetherness without &rsquo;economics&rsquo;.
As old Marx long ago told us: &lsquo;Capitalism is about commodifying everything&rsquo;.
So capitalism will rescue the discipline once more: this time by creating
new markets for a lot of &lsquo;relational commodities&rsquo; for the economists to study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
